peuterey saldi Greenpeace on NY Times Sunday Front Page
Extra Extra! Read all about climate denial scientist Willie Soon dirty money from petrochemical billionaire Charles Koch, coal utility Southern Company, oil giant ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel companies to deny the science of climate change!
The last time I bumped into Willie Soon, I asked him if there was any explanation for some of the information in our latest round of documents indicating that his employer was eager to take money from ExxonMobil:
The questions I tried asking Dr. Soon (who won talk to me, after a few of these encounters went bad for him) seem to show that despite all the embarrassment Soon has caused his employer, the Smithsonian Institution, private communications with ExxonMobil indicate that Smithsonian was all too happy to take Exxon money for their general operating budget.
Is that why the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics allowed Dr. Soon to conduct what essentially is a lobbying and public relations campaign for fossil fuel companies, all in their name? From thedocuments Greenpeace obtained, here the Harvard Smithsonian Center thanking Exxon:
To their credit, Smithsonian officials say they are doing an internal review of Dr. Soon. We see how that goes, but it not encouraging to see that Soon coworkers may have been complicit in peddling influence for ExxonMobil and the other polluters financing Dr. Soon.
we at Greenpeace have been working to make public the secret paper trails that show what everyone already knows: climate science deniers Fakexperts are few and far between, and most of them are paid by companies most responsible for global warming to downplay the problem.
Willie Soon payments from Koch, Exxon, Southern Company and the American Petroleum Institute aren news we known he took over $1 million from these interests since 2011. But the level of detail and the implications from this latest round of research is shocking. From the New York Times:
has accepted more than $1.2 million in money from the fossil fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers. At least 11 papers he has published since 2008 omitted such a disclosure, and in at least eight of those cases, he appears to have violated ethical guidelines of the journals that published his work.
documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as deliverables that he completed in exchange for their money. He used the same term to describe testimony he prepared for Congress. Greenpeace, this raises both legal and ethical questions. From The Guardian:
Is the IRS okay with Charles Koch nonprofit foundation funding research that appears to have directly influenced state and national politicians? Did ExxonMobil violate any Congressional rules by giving Soon a grant just two months afterSoon told Congress he had no financial conflicts of interest, after telling them that climate change isn a crisis? And Southern Company?
We will keep you posted as things unfold keep track on the Climate Investigations Center, where our former colleague Kert Davies is busy trying to answer the same questions. For disclosure know that Kert helped start this work when he still was Greenpeace Research Director. We have continued to partner with him on this since his amicable split from our team.
After you read the Times, check out more on the story about everywhere. The Boston Globe writes that Senator Ed Markey (D MA) plans on opening an investigation on climate science deniers. InsideClimate News notes how Soon has been part of a game plan detailed by the American Petroleum Institute in a leaked memo from 1998. Gawker, Discover Magazine,
and STGIST have more. Gizmodo wins for the most brazen headline.